Cloaking with Malicious/Manipulative Intent
68% very high importance10.7% light consensusLink Acquisition from Known Link Brokers/Sellers
56% high importance13.1% moderate contentionLinks from the Page to Web Spam Sites/Pages
51% moderate importance12.1% moderate contentionCloaking by User Agent
51% moderate importance15.2% moderate contentionFrequent Server Downtime & Site Inaccessibility
51% moderate importance12.3% moderate contentionHiding Text with same/similar colored text/background
49% moderate importance15.3% moderate contentionLinks from the Domain to Web Spam Sites/Pages
48% moderate importance13.1% moderate contentionExcessive Repetition of the Same Anchor Text in a High Percentage/Quantity of External Links to the Site/Page
46% moderate importance11% light consensusCloaking by IP Address
46% moderate importanceHiding Text with CSS by Offsetting the Pixel display outside the visible page area
44% low importance14.8% moderate contentionExcessive Number of Dynamic Parameters in the URL
43% low importance13.5% moderate contentionExcessive Links from Sites Hosted on the Same IP Address C-Block
41% low importance10.5% light consensusLink Acquisition from Manipulative Bait-and-Switch Campaigns(301’ing microsites, etc.)
41% low importance12.9% moderate contentionKeyword Stuffing in the On-Page Text
41% low importance11.3% light consensusHiding Text with CSS
display:none;Styling40% low importance14.2% moderate contentionKeyword Stuffing in the
39% low importance11.2% light consensusKeyword Stuffing in the URL
37% low importance9.9% light consensusLink Acquisition from Manipulative Widget/Badge Campaigns
37% low importance12.8% moderate contentionCloaking by JavaScript/Rich Media Support Detection
37% low importance15.4% moderate contentionCloaking by Cookie Detection
36% low importance16.3% moderate contentionLink Acquisition from Low Quality Paid Directories
36% low importance12.2% moderate contentionExcessive Links from Sites Owned by the Same Registrant
36% low importance12.4% moderate contentionLinks to the Page from Web Spam Sites/Pages
36% low importance13.1% moderate contentionLinks to the Domain from Web Spam Sites/Pages
34% minimal importance14% moderate contentionLink Acquisition from Manipulative Viral Campaigns
33% minimal importance12.9% moderate contentionCloaking with Positive User Experience Intent
33% minimal importance12.8% moderate contentionOver-Optimization of Internal Link Anchor Text
32% minimal importance11.2% light consensusUse of “Poison” Keywords in Anchor Text of External Links (e.g. student credit cards, buy viagra, porn terms, etc.)
32% minimal importance11.9% light consensusLink Acquisition from Buying Old Domains & Redirecting
32% minimal importance13.2% moderate contentionExcessively Long URL
30% minimal importance13% moderate contentionUse of Keyword-Rich Anchor Text Internal Links in Footers
27% minimal importance10.2% moderate consensusKeyword Stuffing in the Meta Description Tag
26% minimal importance11.2% light consensusLink Acquisition from Buying Old Domains and Adding Links
24% very minimal importance10.2% light consensusOveruse of Nofollow on Internal Links for “PageRank Sculpting”
24% very minimal importance10.9% light consensusForum Link Building (Signatures, Link Drops, etc.)
22% very minimal importance12.8% moderate contentionExcessively Long Title Tag
21% very minimal importance9.1% light consensusKeyword Stuffing in the Meta Keywords Tag
15% very minimal importance10.9% light consensus
Friday, 17 September 2010
Top 37 Factors That Effect Ranking Negatively
Posted on 17:15 by Unknown
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment